Sunday, 26 July 2015

Children's Books And Why They're Great (1): The Funny Factor

There comes in point in life, aged maybe twelve or so, when you stop reading children's books and graduate to YA.

Hopefully, it isn't long before you start again.

CS Lewis said, “A children's story that can only be enjoyed by children is not a good children's story in the slightest.” I think this is entirely true, which is why I'm doing a mini-series* highlighting some excellent children's books, for teenagers and adults.

*Doing mini-series makes me feel like such an accomplished and organised blogger.

Today, I'm thinking about humour and its prevalence in children's books.

Maybe it's just me, but this is what I've noticed: YA just isn't that funny. Anna and the French Kiss is squirmingly adorable and we ship it to the moon and back ... but it's not a laugh a minute. Divergent, Throne of Glass, The Hunger Games? Maybe we love them, but A+ humour they do not have.

Of course, there are exceptions!

Skulduggery Pleasant is hilarious.

And let's not forget Harry, Sass Master Extraordinaire.

Oh, and of course, the books of Queen  Maggie Stiefvater are brilliantly funny.

But for the most part, YA is a desert for humour. (And, interesting note: both Skulduggery and Harry walk the line between YA and children's books. The early books in both series are comfortably in the children's camp, I'd say.)

Why is this? Whilst it's sometimes true that YA deals with darker subjects than children's books, that doesn't mean that the humour content should be lower. Maybe YA heroines are just too distracted by love triangles to have any time for humour. I don't know.

I finished this book on Thursday. 

In a Britain run by magicians, the government buys magical children from their parents and apprentices them to magicians. Nathaniel, frustrated by his lacklustre master and his feeling that no one understands his potential, secretly summons 5000-year-old djinni Bartimaeus in a bid for revenge against an old enemy. But when he orders Bartimaeus to steal the ancient Amulet of Sarmakand, he is soon embroiled in a plot that goes far beyond his petty idea of vengeance.

I'd been told before that The Amulet of Sarmakand was "hilarious", so I was expecting humour. Humour I got, but it was also a lot darker than I expected. I imagined that the two MCs would form an adorable and brilliant team ... but, in fact, Bartimaeus was pretty mean, and Nathaniel was a brat. He was selfish and self-obsessed, and made a lot of bad decisions. As such, I found myself siding with Bartimaeus pretty much the whole way through -- but even he was quite cruel.

However, the humour was perfectly balanced.

Footnotes! I love footnotes.

Obviously, this sort of humour comes down to Stroud's particular style. He created an unreliable and very amusing character in Bartimaeus, and this made The Amulet of Sarmakand a highly enjoyable read.

The plot was also fast-paced and interesting, but in the end, it was the humour that defined this book for me, and the humour that gives me my main reason for recommending it.

I'm yet to read The Heroes of Olympus, but from what I've been told they are solidly in the YA camp. However, the first Percy Jackson cycle are, I'd say, definitely children's books.

I binge-reread those three in as many days when I was ill a few months ago (and, once I've finished A Farewell to Arms, I'm going to reread #4 ... yay!), but never did a proper review. (Do you remember when I used to review every book I read? I also used to post every day. Hahahahaha.) Now is the time.

For anyone who doesn't know (and can I ask, where have you been?) the Percy Jackson books tell the story of the eponymous Percy who, after discovering he is the son of Greek god Poseidon, goes to a place called Camp Half-Blood. There he receives training and meets other demigods, as well as a whole host of other creatures, and some of the Olympians themselves. What Percy must quickly learn, however, is that a full-blown war of the gods is brewing, and he and his friends are about to be plunged into its midst. 

I first read the first few Percy Jackson books (the first four, I think) when I was about nine until I was maybe eleven. Then I sort of fell off the end -- it's difficult to keep up with a series when the books come out once a year. You can forget the plot in between book. I normally do.

However, rereading these first three I have fallen in love with them all over again. They are brilliantly fresh -- do you know of any other Greek god books? Do you? -- and fast-paced. Riordan's love and devoted study of Greek mythology spills over on every page; for me, reading these aged ten or so sparked a mythology phase that ensures I now know far more about classical myths even than is found in these pages. Riordan marvellously captures and reworks ancient stories.

The characters are excellent. He goes for a really diverse cast, and introduces the refreshing theme of ADHD and dyslexia for many of his characters, whose inbuilt demigod fighting skills make them hyper-aware all the time, and whose brains are wired for Ancient Greek, thus making it hard to read English. This, paired with the books' easy-to-read style, enables them to connect with children struggling with ADHD and dyslexia, which I think is really important.

Percy is a strong MC. He can be a little annoying, but I think that, in these early books, he captures the essence of being twelve (not that I'd remember. I am as ancient as the forest.), and is ultimately a selfless and brave boy. Annabeth, meanwhile, is an excellent female lead. I love how strong she is, and her love of learning (not letting her above-mentioned dyslexia get in the way of her dreams of being an architect). Then there's Grover; though often viewed as the hopeless on of the trio, he is hilarious, and keeps the rest of the characters together. We all need a Grover.

The thing that really brings these books to life is the humour.

They never fail to make me smile, and for this reason they are an excellent series for readers of any age.

What about you? Do you still read children's books? What's your favourite? And, I am very interested to know, what's the funniest book you've ever read? Do you agree with me that YA needs more humour? And why is the humour absent, anyway? Give me your thoughts.


  1. John Green's always hilarious. I especially liked An Abundance of Katherines and all of its footnotes (maybe many funny books use footnotes, who knows). But I have definitely found that, especially these days, YA is getting less and less funny.

    I love all the quotes in this post by the way. Good job:)

    1. Huh, interesting. I did not find TFIOS funny, but I guess the subject matter is so serious. (I don't know, though. Hazel strongly makes the point that being ill doesn't stop people enjoying life and that'd work with humour, too, surely?) But from what I've heard, AAoK, WG,WG and PT are more light-hearted.

      Thanks! XD

  2. I've noticed the lack of humor in the YA section. Which very much saddens me, since I dearly love to laugh.

    I think the funniest books I've read were an exception to this though. The Lunar Chronicles. *hint hint* (You must read them! I can't even express how much I adore this series. And I now I have to wait for Winter to come out. I'm going to go sulk now.)

    Those FOOTNOTES! Wow. I want to read this book. An unlikable duo with humor to be loved for. I like it!

    Oh my goodness! Percy Jackson! I'm reading The Sea of Monsters right now. This is one of the best kids' books I've read. And it's so hilarious! I like Annabeth too (Really now, how many smart blondes do you see in YA, hm? Yep, the kids' books have it!). Children's books are always funny. Hence, I like them.

    1. Right?? Well, we'll fix this, between the two of us .... yeah? ;)

      OK I'm going to read them! I am! I will! I promise!

      You do want to read the book. It's a good book, honest.

      Really?? Once I've finished A Farewell to Arms, I'm going to read The Battle of the Labyrinth! YAY FOR PERCY! (Agreed. Annabeth is queen.)

  3. I LOVE FUNNY BOOKS. I have to agree that children's books are more usual to be funnny...but, tbh, I haven't ever felt that YA was missing the snortingly-laughter factor! I think there were sooo many hilarious moments in The Hunger Games (basically all Haymitch's lines) and Reboot is hilarious. ALSO CASSANDRA CLARE'S BOOKS. The wit is golden. And I laughed my brain out in Denton's Little Death Date and Me Earl and the Dying Girl. xD So yesss. the humour is darker, but definitely still there.
    I ALSO LOVE THAT CS LEWIS QUOTE. That is my go-to quote for everything. I think children's books should be timeless.

    1. Ah, Cait, that is because you are surpassingly wise in that you have READ ALL THE BOOKS. Ooh but Cassandra Clare, I have finally been persuaded to read TMI.

  4. I LOVE humor in books! Dry humor, goofy humor, witty, sarcastic humor. Give me funny and I'll probably like it. Have you ever read/heard of Alex and the Ironic Gentleman? It's got that goofy humor that I do so love. X)

    ~Coriander was looking far more lively than he had in the morning and, after some cajoling, was persuaded to perform the odd magic trick.

    The Odd Magic Trick is a very famous magic trick that has been passed down through generations of magicians. Basically, it has the magician asking an audience member for a watch, putting a cloth over it, and, after a few hand movements, removing the cloth and revealing a completely different watch that looks exactly like the original, but one on which the time reads 9:52. To which the audience member usually responds, "That was odd."~

    lol I always remember that part, because it made my dad (who was reading it to us) laugh. XD

    1. No, I never have ... to Goodreads!
      ~interval of time~
      Interesting! To be honest, if it's children's fantasy, I'm probably on board!

  5. I do think you are absolutely right, that humour is lacking in YA. I guess it all comes down to what are the trends of the moment, and the books that follow those trends are always going to be the most publishable of the time. So if moody vampires, followed by depressing dystopians, followed by intense high fantasies have been the main trends in YA books from the past few years, and that is what everyone wants to read and buy, then manuscripts following those trends will be much more likely to get picked up by publishers than manuscripts that break those trends and are predominantly funny books. And whereas the YA market is predominantly female-oriented, the children's market is maybe more unisex friendly, which allows for more light-hearted funniness and less serious romances. That's my impression anyways, I'm not positive that that is right. Maybe it's more that my tastes tend to follow the more epic, intense speculative fiction line and so I'm oblivious to all the funny YA reads out there? I don't know. But I do know that I would love to have more funny in my reading life :) I know I MUST get to the Skulduggery Pleasant books someday - seems like all UK and Ireland bloggers I know swear by them and how witty they are!

    1. I absolutely agree with you. Wow, you're right, though - "moody vampires, followed by depressing dystopians, followed by intense high fantasies". I kinda think of vampires as the YA staple, but actually, there've been hardly any vampire novels of late, and even the dystopians are cooling off for fantasy to take their place. I'd not thought of it like that but your analysis is 100% correct!

      SKULDUGGERY! You need him. You just do. Your life is so lacking right now and you don't even now it. Oh, Aylee. SKULDUGGERY!!!! ~collapses on the floor~


  6. Discover a Surefire Method to Teach Your Child to Read

    There are many different methods and opinions on how to teach a child to read - while all are well-intentioned, some methods could actually lead to reading difficulties in children. Learning to read is a critical step towards future academic success and later on success in life. If you cannot read, you cannot succeed. There is an amazingly simple method - actually, a combination of two methods - that can teach anyone to read, even children as young as 2 and 3 years old.

    The combination of these two methods has been used in the Children Learning Reading program to successfully teach thousands of young children to read. So what are these methods?

    It is the combination of synthetic phonics and phonemic awareness. Most have probably heard of phonics, but phonemic awareness is a concept less well known and ?it's not something you hear about often. Certainly, phonics is absolutely necessary to develop fluent reading skills; however, there are different types of phonics including embedded, analogy, analytical, and synthetic phonics. While using some type of phonics is better than not including any phonics instructions at all, you will achieve FAR BETTER results by employing synthetic phonics, which is by far the most easy and effective method for teaching reading. Multiple studies support this.

    In a 7 year study conducted by the Scottish Education Department, 300 students were taught using either analytic phonics or synthetic phonics. The results found that the synthetic phonics group were reading 7 months ahead and spelling 8 to 9 months ahead of the other phonics groups. At the end of the 7 year study, the children were reading 3.5 years ahead of their chronological age.

    Very impressive!

    Through their amazing reading program, the creators (Jim & Elena - parents of 4 children and reading teachers) have taught all of their children to read phonetically by 3 years old and have helped thousands of parents to successfully teach their children to read as well! Some are small 2 or 3 year old toddlers, others are young 4 or 5 year old preschoolers, and still others at ages 6, 7, 8 or even older.

    >> Click here to watch amazing videos of young children reading, and see the amazing results so many parents are achieving with their children.

    The Children Learning Reading program works so well that many children will achieve reading ages far ahead of their chronological age.

    Take Jim & Elena's children as an example: their oldest child, Raine, was reading phonetically at 2 years 11 months old, and by the time she entered kindergarten at 5 years old, she was reading at a grade 5 level with a reading age of 11.9 years - almost 7 years ahead of her chronological age. Their second child, Ethan, learned to read phonetically by 2 years 9 months, and at age 3, he was reading at a grade 2 level with a reading age of 7.2 years - progressing at a similarly quick pace as his older sister. Find that hard to believe? You can watch the videos posted here.

    There are many different phonics programs out there, but rarely do you ever hear a mention of phonemic awareness (PA), and PA is absolutely an equally critical component to developing reading skills in children. What makes the Children Learning Reading program so unique and amazingly effective at teaching young children is that it seamlessly combines the teaching of synthetic phonics along with phonemic awareness to enable children to develop superb reading skills.

    >>> Click here to learn more about the Children Learning Reading program and teach your child to read today


Thanks for commenting! :)